|Check out our New Publishers' Select for Free Articles|
Current Molecular Medicine (v.12, #6)
Editorial (Hot Topic: Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Cancer: From Chemistry, Biology to Clinical Applications and Personalized Therapy) by Alexandros G. Georgakilas (pp. 653-654).
Oxidatively Generated DNA Lesions as Potential Biomarkers of In Vivo Oxidative Stress by J.-L. Ravanat (pp. 655-671).
During the last three decades there was an increasing interest for developing biomarkers of oxidative stress. Therefore, efforts have been made to develop sensitive methods aimed at measuring cellular levels of oxidatively generated DNA lesions. Initially, most attention had focused on 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2’- deoxyguanosine (8-oxodGuo) probably because reliable analytical methods (mostly HPLC coupled to electrochemical detection) were available since mid-eighties to detect that lesion at the cellular level. With the recent development of more versatile analytical (using mass spectrometric detection) and biochemical assays (such as the comet assay) efforts are currently made to measure simultaneously several DNA lesions. The main degradation pathways of the four main pyrimidine (thymine, cytosine) and purine (adenine, guanine) bases mediated by hydroxyl radical (•OH), one-electron oxidants and singlet oxygen (1O2) have been also studied in detail and results indicate that other DNA modification than 8-oxodGuo could represent suitable biomarkers of oxidative stress. In this review article, the main oxidative degradation products of DNA will be presented together with their mechanisms of formation. Then the developed methods aimed at measuring cellular levels of oxidatively generated DNA lesions will be critically reviewed based on their specificity, versatility and sensitivity. Illustration of the powerfulness of the described methods will be demonstrated using quantification of DNA lesions in cells exposed to ionizing radiations. In addition, recent work highlighting the possible formation of complex DNA lesions will be reported and commented regarding the possibility of using such complex damage as potential biomarkers of oxidative stress.
The Interplay Between Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Carcinogenesis by S. Nowsheen (pp. 672-680).
Emerging data suggest that primary dysfunction in the tumor microenvironment is crucial for carcinogenesis. These recent findings make a compelling case for targeting the milieu for cancer chemoprevention as well as therapy. The stroma is an integral part of its physiology, and functionally, one cannot totally dissociate the tumor surrounding from the tumor cells. A thorough understanding of the tumor and stroma will aid us in developing new treatment targets. In this review, we shed light at the key aspects of the carcinogenic process and how oxidative stress and inflammation contribute to this process. We dissect the connection between metastasis and oxidative stress and focus on the key players in the tumor microenvironment that leads to inflammation, oxidative stress and DNA damage. Moreover, we consider the role of inflammation in disease, specifically cancer and metastasis. Finally, we discuss the potential applications in prognosis and cancer treatment.
Biomarkers of Protein Oxidation in Human Disease by A. Garcia-Garcia (pp. 681-697).
Oxidative stress is caused by an imbalance between the production of reactive species of oxygen and nitrogen (RS) and the ability to either detoxify the reactive intermediates produced or repair the resulting damage. Ultimately, oxidative stress conveys the alteration in cellular function caused by the reaction of RS with cellular constituents. Oxidative stress has been extensively reported to participate in the progression of a variety of human diseases including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders and diabetes. Oxidation of proteins is thought to be one of the major mechanisms by which oxidative stress is integrated into cellular signal transduction pathways. Thus, recent research efforts have been aimed to identify the role of specific oxidative protein modifications in the signal transduction events mediating the etiology of human diseases progression. The identification of these oxidative modifications has also raised the possibility of using this knowledge to develop new methods to diagnose diseases before they are clinically evident. In this work, we summarize the mechanisms by which RS generate distinct oxidative modifications. Furthermore, we also review the potential of these oxidative modifications to be used as early biomarkers of human disease.
Oxidative Stress Based-Biomarkers in Oral Carcinogenesis: How Far Have We Gone? by R. Hanafi (pp. 698-703).
Oral cancer accounts for 2-3% of all malignancies and according to the World Health Organization (WHO) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. On the other hand, “oxidative stress” implies a cellular state whereby reactive oxygen species (ROS) production exceeds its metabolism resulting in excessive ROS accumulation and overwhelmed cellular defenses. Such a state has been shown to be involved in the multistage process of human carcinogenesis (including oral cancer) via many different mechanisms. Amongst them are ROS-induced oxidative modifications on major cellular macromolecules like DNA, proteins and lipids with the resulting byproducts being involved in the pathophysiology of human oral malignant and pre-malignant lesions. Throughout this manuscript, we review the current state of knowledge on the role of these oxidativemodified cellular byproducts in serving as reliable biomarkers for oral cancer detection, prognosis and diagnosis.
The Tumor Suppressor Gene ARF as a Sensor of Oxidative Stress by M. Liontos (pp. 704-715).
Oxidative stress as a result of either exogenous stimuli or cellular metabolism affects several cellular processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, cell death and senescence. Consequently, it is implicated in the pathogenesis of various human diseases like cancer, diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, neurodegenerative diseases and aging. Oxidative stress is implicated in carcinogenesis either by directly provoking DNA damage or through the regulation of intracellular signaling cascades. In both cases the cellular response to oxidative stress is determined by the cellular context. ARF, the alternative protein product of the CDKN2A locus has been recently recognized as a novel sensor of oxidative stress, in a β-catenin and Hsp70-mediated manner. Since, improved understanding of cellular responses to oxidative stress may facilitate the design of novel antineoplastic regimens, we herein review the mechanisms by which oxidative stress promotes carcinogenesis, focusing on the role of ARF as a sensor of oxidative stress.
Monitoring Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in the Lipidome: Is There a Roadmap for “Human Inspection”? by H. Jungnickel (pp. 716-731).
Oxidative stress is more and more recognized as the underlying motif for a broad variety of diseases including cancer. Medicine faces the paramount task to develop better diagnostic tools and drug treatment prediction models in the future to significantly enhance the quality of life. Special interest will focus on earlystage disease biomarkers and biomarkers that could predict healing success at the earliest time point after the treatment started. The accelerated formation of so-called reactive oxygen species (ROS) is becoming widely regarded as the underlying process associated with many diseases like myocardial infarction, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and kidney disease, etc. Once generated within cells and tissues, ROS can react with a variety of cellular metabolites like fatty acids, proteins or DNA. This review investigates the possibilities for various oxidized metabolites as well as proteomics, genomics and bioimaging biomarkers to serve as early-stage disease biomarkers or biomarkers for drug treatment success. We also assess the value of a step-by-step or cascade biomarker approach as a new paradigm in medical diagnostics. Examples are given for possible analytical methodology and tools as well as statistical methods that could be applied. Such an approach may straighten the road toward new medical diagnostics and treatment regimes, which ultimately could lead to a significantly enhanced medical service for patients suffering from chronic and debilitating or deadly diseases including cancer. Examples from recent research are given to show the progress and possibilities for the proposed model.
Oxidative Stress Generated Damage to DNA by Gastrointestinal Exposure to Insoluble Particles by P. Moller (pp. 732-745).
There is growing concern that gastrointestinal exposure to particles is associated with increased risk of toxicity to internal organs and carcinogenicity. The mechanism of action is related to particle-induced oxidative stress and oxidation of DNA. Observations from animal models indicate that gastrointestinal exposure to single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT), fullerenes C60, carbon black, titanium dioxide and diesel exhaust particles generates oxidized DNA base lesions in organs such as the bone marrow, liver and lung. Oral exposure to nanosized carbon black has also been associated with increased level of lipid peroxidation derived exocyclic DNA adducts in the liver, suggesting multiple pathways of oxidative stress for particle-generated damage to DNA. At equal dose, diesel exhaust particles (SRM2975) generated larger levels of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine in rat liver than carbon black (Printex 90) did, whereas exposure to fullerenes C60 and SWCNT was the least potent. This ranking of samples was also observed for oxidatively damaged DNA in cultured cells. The extent of translocation from the gut is largely unresolved. However, there is evidence indicating that gastrointestinal exposure to particulate matter is associated with oxidative damage to DNA and this might be associated with increased risk of cancer.
Tumor Invasion and Oxidative Stress: Biomarkers and Therapeutic Strategies by L. Muinelo-Romay (pp. 746-762).
Tumor invasion is paradigmatic of the complex interactions connecting a carcinoma with its environment, and a reflex of the cellular and molecular heterogeneity that defines the initiation of dissemination and metastasis. The hostile situation generated by a growing carcinoma and a reactive stroma is at the basis of the promotion of carcinoma invasion and metastasis, with oxidative stress emerging as a main player in the acquisition of an aggressive tumor phenotype. In this review, we present this complex scenario with a focus on the contribution of the reactive environment and the oxidative stress to the cellular and molecular events associated with carcinoma invasion and metastasis. We also discuss the potential of oxidative stress as a source of biomarkers of advance disease, and as supplier of a therapeutic armamentarium against the initial steps of metastatic dissemination.
Current and Proposed Biomarkers of Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity in Cancer: Emerging Opportunities in Oxidative Damage and Autophagy by J. S. Dickey (pp. 763-771).
A biomarker is defined as “a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biologic processes, pathogenic processes, or biological responses to a therapeutic intervention”. Biomarkers can be utilized to detect disease, evaluate treatment risks, or determine treatment effectiveness. In the case of cancer, anthracyclines such as doxorubicin are front-line therapy to treat a number of different malignancies including breast cancer. However, a significant fraction of patients experience drug-induced cardiotoxicity. This toxicity is dose-limiting and can cause long-term morbidity or mortality. There is an unmet medical need to identify patients who are at risk for doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, to detect cardiac damage early so that patient risk can be minimized, and to monitor the success of cardioprotective strategies. Therefore, doxorubicin treatment of cancer is an excellent example of the need for biomarkers to indicate drug safety in addition to drug efficacy. In this review we will discuss the mechanism of doxorubicinassociated cardiotoxicity, as well as other cancer therapies that induce cardiac toxicity by causing oxidative damage. We will also evaluate established and proposed biomarkers for cardiotoxicity based on our evolving knowledge of oxidative damage and subsequent autophagy. Finally, we will discuss advantages of combining oxidative damage- and autophagy-based protein biomarkers with current biomarkers such as troponins to facilitate early detection and mitigation of cardiotoxicity induced by cancer therapeutic agents.
Tissue Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy by P. T. Tran (pp. 772-787).
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer deaths among men in the United States. Most men have localized disease diagnosed following an elevated serum prostate specific antigen test for cancer screening purposes. Standard treatment options consist of surgery or definitive radiation therapy directed by clinical factors that are organized into risk stratification groups. Current clinical risk stratification systems are still insufficient to differentiate lethal from indolent disease. Similarly, a subset of men in poor risk groups need to be identified for more aggressive treatment and enrollment into clinical trials. Furthermore, these clinical tools are very limited in revealing information about the biologic pathways driving these different disease phenotypes and do not offer insights for novel treatments which are needed in men with poor-risk disease. We believe molecular biomarkers may serve to bridge these inadequacies of traditional clinical factors opening the door for personalized treatment approaches that would allow tailoring of treatment options to maximize therapeutic outcome. We review the current state of prognostic and predictive tissuebased molecular biomarkers which can be used to direct localized prostate cancer treatment decisions, specifically those implicated with definitive and salvage radiation therapy.
Biomarkers to Assess the Targeting of DNA Repair Pathways to Augment Tumor Response to Therapy by S. Nowsheen (pp. 788-803).
Hyper-activation of DNA repair pathways can enable tumor cells to survive DNA damage. Therefore, targeting specific DNA repair pathways might prove efficacious for cancer therapy. The advent of personalized therapy necessitates novel biomarkers to assess tumor response to therapy. Biological indicators are vital in the field of cancer research and treatment. The focus of this review is on the DNA repair machinery as an emerging target for enhancement of therapy. Additionally, DNA damage and repair biomarkers for prognosis in different types of cancer will be discussed. The application of biomarkers to assess tumor response to therapy based on targeting DNA repair pathways can potentially improve patient quality of life and aid in treatment design.