Forgot your password?
New user?
New Window Opens on the Secret Life of Microbes: Scientists Develop First Microbial Profiles of Ecosystems
CAS announces the release of SciFinder Scholar for Mac OS X
Press Releases
Press Releases
| Check out our New Publishers' Select for Free Articles |
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science (v.138, #2)
Semifluorinated alkanes — Primitive surfactants of fascinating properties by Marcin Broniatowski; Patrycja Dynarowicz-Łątka (pp. 63-83).
Semifluorinated alkanes (SFAs) are diblock molecules, in which two mutually immiscible moieties, namely the hydrocarbon segment and the perfluorinated segment are bound covalently. The presence of two opposing segments within one molecule makes semifluorinated alkanes a very interesting class of compounds, which show a particular behavior both in bulk and at interfaces. Their highly asymmetric structure, arising from the incompatibility of the both constituent parts, results in surface activity of these molecules (so-called primitive surfactants) when dissolved in organic solvents, and allows for the Langmuir monolayer formation if spread at the air/water interface, despite of the absence of any polar group. Since 1984 (when SFAs have been characterized for the first time by Rabolt et al. [Rabolt JF, Russell TP, Twieg RJ. Macromolecules 1984;17:2786]), semifluorinated alkanes have been subjected to many studies. The present article reviews the results obtained so far and covers the aspects of their synthesis, properties in bulk (solutions and solid state) and applications. Special emphasis is put on the Langmuir monolayer properties and self-organization of SFAs on solid substrates.
Keywords: Semifluorinated alkanes; Primitive surfactants; Langmuir monolayers; Self-assembly; Liquid crystalline properties
Semifluorinated alkanes — Primitive surfactants of fascinating properties by Marcin Broniatowski; Patrycja Dynarowicz-Łątka (pp. 63-83).
Semifluorinated alkanes (SFAs) are diblock molecules, in which two mutually immiscible moieties, namely the hydrocarbon segment and the perfluorinated segment are bound covalently. The presence of two opposing segments within one molecule makes semifluorinated alkanes a very interesting class of compounds, which show a particular behavior both in bulk and at interfaces. Their highly asymmetric structure, arising from the incompatibility of the both constituent parts, results in surface activity of these molecules (so-called primitive surfactants) when dissolved in organic solvents, and allows for the Langmuir monolayer formation if spread at the air/water interface, despite of the absence of any polar group. Since 1984 (when SFAs have been characterized for the first time by Rabolt et al. [Rabolt JF, Russell TP, Twieg RJ. Macromolecules 1984;17:2786]), semifluorinated alkanes have been subjected to many studies. The present article reviews the results obtained so far and covers the aspects of their synthesis, properties in bulk (solutions and solid state) and applications. Special emphasis is put on the Langmuir monolayer properties and self-organization of SFAs on solid substrates.
Keywords: Semifluorinated alkanes; Primitive surfactants; Langmuir monolayers; Self-assembly; Liquid crystalline properties
Wetting on axially-patterned heterogeneous surfaces by M.A. Rodríguez-Valverde; F.J. Montes Ruiz-Cabello; M.A. Cabrerizo-Vilchez (pp. 84-100).
Contact angle variability, leading to errors in interpretation, arises from various sources. Contact angle hysteresis (history-dependent wetting) and contact angle multiplicity (corrugation of three-phase contact line) are irrespectively the most frequent causes of this uncertainty. Secondary effects also derived from the distribution of chemical defects on solid surfaces, and so due to the existence of boundaries, are the known “stick/jump-slip” phenomena. Currently, the underlying mechanisms in contact angle hysteresis and their connection to “stick/jump-slip” effects and the prediction of thermodynamic contact angle are not fully understood. In this study, axial models of smooth heterogeneous surface were chosen in order to mitigate contact angle multiplicity. For each axial pattern, advancing, receding and equilibrium contact angles were predicted from the local minima location of the system free energy. A heuristic model, based on the local Young equation for spherical drops on patch-wise axial patterns, was fruitfully tested from the results of free-energy minimization. Despite the very simplistic surface model chosen in this study, it allowed clarifying concepts usually misleading in wetting phenomena.
Keywords: Contact angle; Hysteresis; Stick-jump-slip; Heterogeneity; Axial pattern
Wetting on axially-patterned heterogeneous surfaces by M.A. Rodríguez-Valverde; F.J. Montes Ruiz-Cabello; M.A. Cabrerizo-Vilchez (pp. 84-100).
Contact angle variability, leading to errors in interpretation, arises from various sources. Contact angle hysteresis (history-dependent wetting) and contact angle multiplicity (corrugation of three-phase contact line) are irrespectively the most frequent causes of this uncertainty. Secondary effects also derived from the distribution of chemical defects on solid surfaces, and so due to the existence of boundaries, are the known “stick/jump-slip” phenomena. Currently, the underlying mechanisms in contact angle hysteresis and their connection to “stick/jump-slip” effects and the prediction of thermodynamic contact angle are not fully understood. In this study, axial models of smooth heterogeneous surface were chosen in order to mitigate contact angle multiplicity. For each axial pattern, advancing, receding and equilibrium contact angles were predicted from the local minima location of the system free energy. A heuristic model, based on the local Young equation for spherical drops on patch-wise axial patterns, was fruitfully tested from the results of free-energy minimization. Despite the very simplistic surface model chosen in this study, it allowed clarifying concepts usually misleading in wetting phenomena.
Keywords: Contact angle; Hysteresis; Stick-jump-slip; Heterogeneity; Axial pattern
Contact line motion and dynamic wetting of nanofluid solutions by Khellil Sefiane; Jennifer Skilling; Jamie MacGillivray (pp. 101-120).
The effect that nanoparticles play in the spreading of nanofluids dynamically wetting and dewetting solid substrates is investigated experimentally, using ‘drop shape’ analysis technique to analyse aluminium–ethanol contact lines advancing and receding over hydrophobic Teflon-AF coated substrates. Results obtained from the advancing/receding contact line analysis show that the nanoparticles in the vicinity of the three-phase contact line enhance the dynamic wetting behaviour of aluminium–ethanol nanofluids for concentrations up to approximately 1% concentration by weight. Two mechanisms were identified as a potential reason for the observed enhancement in spreading of nanofluids: structural disjoining pressure and friction reduction due to nanoparticle adsorption on the solid surface.The observed ‘lubricating effect’ that the nanoparticles seem to be inducing is similar to the ‘superspreading’ effect for surfactant solutions spreading on hydrophobic surfaces, up to a concentration (weight) of approximately 1%, could be a result of the predicted enhanced wetting behaviour. Indeed, Trokhymchuk et al. [ Langmuir, 2001, 17, 4940] observed a solid-like ordering of nanoparticles in the vicinity of the three-phase contact line, leading to an increased pressure in the fluid ‘wedge’. This increased pressure leads to a pressure gradient which causes the nanofluids to exhibit enhanced wetting characteristics.Another possible cause for the observed increase in advancing/receding contact line velocity could be deposition of nanoparticles on the solid surface in the vicinity of the three-phase contact line resulting in the nanofluid effectively advancing over aluminium rather than Teflon-AF, or the contact line ‘rolling’ over nanoparticles at the three-phase contact line due to sphericity of nanoparticles. For either of these to be the case, the nanoparticle effect at the three-phase contact line would have to be enhanced for the lower concentration in the same way that it would have to be for the increased pressure in the fluid ‘wedge’.
Contact line motion and dynamic wetting of nanofluid solutions by Khellil Sefiane; Jennifer Skilling; Jamie MacGillivray (pp. 101-120).
The effect that nanoparticles play in the spreading of nanofluids dynamically wetting and dewetting solid substrates is investigated experimentally, using ‘drop shape’ analysis technique to analyse aluminium–ethanol contact lines advancing and receding over hydrophobic Teflon-AF coated substrates. Results obtained from the advancing/receding contact line analysis show that the nanoparticles in the vicinity of the three-phase contact line enhance the dynamic wetting behaviour of aluminium–ethanol nanofluids for concentrations up to approximately 1% concentration by weight. Two mechanisms were identified as a potential reason for the observed enhancement in spreading of nanofluids: structural disjoining pressure and friction reduction due to nanoparticle adsorption on the solid surface.The observed ‘lubricating effect’ that the nanoparticles seem to be inducing is similar to the ‘superspreading’ effect for surfactant solutions spreading on hydrophobic surfaces, up to a concentration (weight) of approximately 1%, could be a result of the predicted enhanced wetting behaviour. Indeed, Trokhymchuk et al. [ Langmuir, 2001, 17, 4940] observed a solid-like ordering of nanoparticles in the vicinity of the three-phase contact line, leading to an increased pressure in the fluid ‘wedge’. This increased pressure leads to a pressure gradient which causes the nanofluids to exhibit enhanced wetting characteristics.Another possible cause for the observed increase in advancing/receding contact line velocity could be deposition of nanoparticles on the solid surface in the vicinity of the three-phase contact line resulting in the nanofluid effectively advancing over aluminium rather than Teflon-AF, or the contact line ‘rolling’ over nanoparticles at the three-phase contact line due to sphericity of nanoparticles. For either of these to be the case, the nanoparticle effect at the three-phase contact line would have to be enhanced for the lower concentration in the same way that it would have to be for the increased pressure in the fluid ‘wedge’.